Deliverables+2011


 * =**__ 3 months after execution of contract __** : = || **__ Deliverable content __** ||
 * 1. Minutes from CT Coordinating Committee Meeting,including list of members || [[file:MeetingMinutes_April2011.doc]] ||
 * 2. List of members for Vertebrate, Invertebrate and Plant Work Groups || [[file:Committees_April2011.doc]] ||
 * 3. Updated ANS listing criteria for vertebrates, invertebrates, and plants || New listing criteria were proposed and discussed at the April 2011 meeting, but the Workgroup preferred to keep the old criteria:

||
 * =**__ 6 months after execution of contract __** : = ||  ||
 * 1. Listing criteria for Plant ANS || See Item 3 above ||
 * 2. Updated CT ANS List, including vertebrate, invertebrate and plant species || [[file:MasterSpeciesList_20111221.xls]] ||
 * 3. Revised list of Management Classes for all listed species, including newly listed species || ? Same as previous item? ||
 * 4. Revised List of Vectors || [[file:VectorList.doc]] ||
 * 5. Updated Vector lists for vertebrates, invertebrates, and plants || ? Same as previous item? ||
 * 6. Draft Connecticut Rapid Response Plan || This was presented and discussed at the October 2011 Workgroup meeting. See "EDRRPlan_Dec2011.docx" in Final deliverables below. ||


 * =**__ 9 months after execution of contract __** : = ||||  ||
 * 1. Minutes from second CT Coordinating Committee |||| [[file:MeetingMinutes_Oct2011.doc]] ||
 * 2. Protocols for Industry Introductions in the following key areas:
 * aquaculture/hatchery;
 * bait sales,
 * nursery and pet trade,
 * mechanical weed harvesting activities |||| In progress: ..... "PreventionProtocols" summary document ||
 * 3. Best Management Practices/Protocols for Aquaria |||| See "PreventionProtocols.docx" above ||
 * 4. Protocols to minimize recreational boating and fishing introductions. Summary of methods used to enforce of ANS boating regulations |||| See "PreventionProtocols.docx" above ||
 * 5. Best management Practices/Protocols for research document |||| See "PreventionProtocols.docx" above ||
 * 6. Draft of the Early Detection, Monitoring and Assessment Plan |||| This has been incorporated into an "Early Detection and Rapid Response Plan." Draft was presented and discussed at the October 2011 Workgroup meeting. See "EDRRPlan_Dec2011.dox" in Final deliverables below. ||
 * =**__ Final deliverables: __**= ||||  ||
 * List of potential funding sources for ANS program and projects |||| ToDo: ... Write up and expand notes ||
 * List of priority needs for educational materials/products |||| ToDo: .... Write up and expand notes ||
 * Summary of ANS Coordinating Committee meetings and Work Group accomplishments. |||| See meeting minutes above. ||
 * Copy of information prepared for inclusion on the DEP Invasive Species website (format/links to be agreed upon during preparation) |||| ToDo: … via the Wiki. Need to review and prepare an official “draft” website ||
 * CT Early Detection, Monitoring and Assessment Plan |||| This has been incorporated into an "Early Detection and Rapid Response Plan." See "EDRRPlan_Dec2011.dox" below. ||
 * “ANS Taxonomic Experts” List and database for freshwater and marine species |||| Based on the discussion at the Workgroup meetings, it has been decided that the DEEP taxonomic leeds will use the CT ANS Workgroup as taxonomic experts. ||
 * “ANS Control Experts” List and database for freshwater and marine species |||| This deliverable may not be feasible at this time. Talk to Nancy. Chuck Lee is starting a pre-qualification process. ||
 * Copy of FY11 ANS Report, any Interim Reports that may be requested |||| Report was submitted. ||
 * Final Connecticut ANS Rapid Response Plan |||| [[file:EDRRPlan_Dec2011.doc]] ||
 * Updated CT Aquatic Nuisance Species Plan based on work completed as part of Cooperative Agreement |||| The program sponsors have indicated that they would prefer that state plans not be updated at this time. The goals and objectives in the original plan are still relevant in 2011. The work proposed in the plan is still needed. It has been suggested that any available staff time and other resources would be better spent in trying to implement the currently proposed work. ||